baatliwala@lemmy.world to Android@lemdro.idEnglish · 8 days agoGoogle Photos is losing some of its editing shortcuts to 'reduce accidental triggers'9to5google.comexternal-linkmessage-square13fedilinkarrow-up122arrow-down11
arrow-up121arrow-down1external-linkGoogle Photos is losing some of its editing shortcuts to 'reduce accidental triggers'9to5google.combaatliwala@lemmy.world to Android@lemdro.idEnglish · 8 days agomessage-square13fedilink
minus-squareTJA!@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·8 days agoYes, I know that. I just don’t understand the purpose of this single word comment in a post about ux enhancements in Google photos.
minus-squaredabster291@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·8 days agoThey were name-dropping a competitor to Google photos, implying the competitor is the solution to the issue/enshittification presented in the article (although I don’t know if anyone who doesn’t already know about it will recognise the name).
minus-squaredefinitemaybe@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·8 days agoThe last sentence is kinda core to why parent poster’s comment isn’t really helpful. But here we are talking about it, so more evidence that engagement hacking works, I guess?
Yes, I know that. I just don’t understand the purpose of this single word comment in a post about ux enhancements in Google photos.
They were name-dropping a competitor to Google photos, implying the competitor is the solution to the issue/enshittification presented in the article (although I don’t know if anyone who doesn’t already know about it will recognise the name).
The last sentence is kinda core to why parent poster’s comment isn’t really helpful.
But here we are talking about it, so more evidence that engagement hacking works, I guess?