Reliability. We’ve put them in small businesses and they do their job very well VS a frankenpc NAS.
I have 2 8-Bay devices at home and they are so good for what they are. Silent, low power, bit of fancy utility for those that like it but reliable and quality. They age very well.
I also use the surveillance station with my cameras which all connected ootb fine. (mix of brands)
The real shame is they didn’t open source the app on decom.
You asked the drawback on a thread about Synology.
Doesn’t look like it hooks into their unifi ecosystem which would be a big negative for me.
Edit: the pro does but what that even looks like idk
While I agree with the doing whatever you want on a custom build I very much doubt the reliability as per my comment here.
https://lemmy.world/comment/16523392
Personally I’ll be moving to rack units when these finally kick the bucket.
Only 7 bays and small rack size. It’s a NAS not like Synology + series.
Grab one of the 8 bays now, this won’t affect anything currently released. I don’t see me having to retire my 1813+ or 1819+ (both 8bay) anytime soon and both are 4+ years old without a hiccup.
The Unifi rackmount NAS looks pretty sweet imho.
The reason why Synology is great is their bulletproof reliability.
Sure you might be able to make a PC perform the same spec for spec but will it actually? And even with these devices, they are so far from Apple it isn’t funny, you have to set up a fair bit still to make the most of them. Also why use a 500w psu VS low power consumption of a NAS device.
Honestly HDDs/SDDs are a disposable part of the backup ecosystem, I get that they want some extra money but there are already scripts to overcome some of the existing compability checkers in these systems.
I get why they do this sort of thing but it didn’t stop us re-adding video station and h265 support back into our Synos.
Someone already made a script to overwrite the existing compatible drive checker so someone will write a new script to fix the new one.
This way my thought, I highly doubt they are getting none, just not looking at the proxy logs.
I was hoping for a guide to capture said configs with a recommended subset. Not instructions for using git.
So no the guides don’t help with that.
I’ll just stick to my mkdocs repo.
deleted by creator
Edit: Was asking about the config targetting process for git (not how to use git) and was going to ask an AI to do some googling for me.
I think the point behind it is to waste the sniffers time sniffing for ports that it could be using to be making attempts.
Its not a security thing, it’s just increasing the cost to snoop.
The metadata server isn’t updated and hasn’t for a long time so it stops after a point in time and certain authors with lots of books just don’t come up.
Given the readarr team are looking for maintainers to take over, I doubt it’ll be resolved soon.
https://www.reddit.com/r/selfhosted/comments/16d7gyo/since_readarr_seems_down_for_the_count_is/
I’d suggest integrate with LazyLibrarian over Readarr as it’s metadata and ability to add recent books is borked probably forever.
Seems like a vulnerability to exploit
Building a simple workflow with AI agent for our community watch group. Also building an open source automation platform, currently working through GUI templates for it.
Mint or Ubuntu is like Windows but better.