“just watch the video, it’s fine if you use this third party app to remove the embedded ad” is not the ringing endorsement you think it is.
Especially if the whole point is a sovergin-citizen esque reading of the constitution that ignores either the legislation or supreme court precedent that argued against the point.
(While it’s stupid, offensive, and.un-american, ICE agents DO currently enjoy personal immunity for any acts done in accordance with ICE directives.)
“just watch the video, it’s fine if you use this third party app to remove the embedded ad” is not the ringing endorsement you think it is.
Especially if the whole point is a sovergin-citizen esque reading of the constitution that ignores either the legislation or supreme court precedent that argued against the point.
(While it’s stupid, offensive, and.un-american, ICE agents DO currently enjoy personal immunity for any acts done in accordance with ICE directives.)