Though it could be cheaper to have a backup or 2, all identical bits stored on them and swap them out as(/if) they fail
Though it could be cheaper to have a backup or 2, all identical bits stored on them and swap them out as(/if) they fail
Alpine Linux’s setup has some nice options for this too
USB/IP for a KVM switch might still work, as long as termux supports all that
Distributed my servers across a couple old PC’s hooked up to a 10 gig switch, admittedly I hardly use it for anything - but my syncthing cloud maxes out any connection locally
They only supported it because their emulator works, no game specific patches were published until the game was released and properly bought by the devs (and they were fairly strict on this in the discord)
Nah they run a pretty tight ship, ie didnt even allow discussing totk when it was leaked
In theory Incus and LXD by default will be slightly heavier than docker; they run a a lot more bare-metal services (ex. systemd) in container giving them more flexability and a VM like feel, which would 99% of the time be wasted resources in a docker container
They also dont have nearly as much ‘out of the box’ support as Docker/Podman might, especially for single process containers.
That being said docker used to run on lxc until not too long ago, so there’s still many similarities between the 2
Depending on your threat model incus/lxd won’t add too much security as they generally use the same background software as docker, leaving things kernel exploits as vulerable as just docker
Damn, I’m just repeating what ive heard but its weird the whole team isn’t doing as much moderating as one’d expect
(edit: might not be sole) Dev/moderator doesnt want a team but has some health issues presumably, so definitely can’t manage it themselves. This is just the aftermath of a couple months of that
KVM makes proxmox type 1
I haven’t spent much time tinkering with it but the plug-n-play xbox experience uses the joystick like a mouse cursor, not like the android-tv’s joystick to select menus - which is obviously sub par
Though this is more of a proxmox ease of use issue than docker, personally I swapped from it to pure debian server/host to run a similar manual setup with podman - so everything runs right on the host.
In theory I think you can achieve this with proxmox ssh’ing into the host and just treating it like a usual debian
Depends on the device, but on devices like android no.
I can’t say I’ve gone through with it myself, but in theory you could have a host somewhere connected to a VPN that you send a your tailscale traffic through as an exit node
Though if you have hairpin mode on your router/switch I believe it works, just most not bought specific for it don’t have the option
Maybe do some gtk Broadway funkyness if they feel like playing god and want browser access
If you want to really get into it, you can just hose a wireguard instance in a LXC then use iptables for all your routing.
Relies only on FOSS software and gives you a pretty high level of control, but obviously is less intuitive
Ngl proxmox would be your best bet then, especially for reliability and being able to forget about most of the linux background.
Qemu is what proxmox uses behind the scenes, but puts an easy to use webUI in front of everything, minus a couple less used/less stable features some power users like
Shit eh, my googling skills must be falling
Just for an anecdote on functional vlans, I once knew someone that had their WAN sent into a managed switch, set it on a vlan with their router elsewhere in the network