I guess its relevant in the absence of additional information. However, if you have video, or witnesses, or accurate statements from those involved, those factors are more relevant.

I’ve lost all faith that the populace will ever wake up, per se.

I’m happy to concede that I’m wrong about this.

When I was learning to drive my dad told me that if you have an accident, the insurer will assign fault to whomever has damage to the front of their vehicle.

I’ve done some very brief research and determined that I’ve been completely wrong about this for the last 26 years. Thanks for that dad.

Im not so sure they would be found “at fault” by an insurer if im honest.

The damage appears to be on the front of her car, but on the side of theirs.

An insurer would likely find that while the van obviously shouldn’t have cut across, the hatchback is at fault.

On the first day with any instructor they will tell you to drive to the conditions. That means that if ICE is present, and kidnapping people, drive slowly enough that you can stop if they cut over into your lane.

How many armed thugs do you think this chick could’ve taken out?

Actually i feel more like the American populace FA period has come to an and and the FO period has arrived.

This video demonstrates my point.

Who is the person in black, with a mask, and vest, getting the close up photos / video at about 1:20?

Do you think the discipline and training will improve in time?

I mean its possible to be disciplined, well trained asshole surely.

I was wondering about this.

Suppose there was a fair election in 2 years (I know, I know) and suppose the dems won… would they dismantle ICE and prosecute these scum?

Let people use post whatever they want.

services:
  qbittorrent:
    image: lscr.io/linuxserver/qbittorrent
    container_name: qbittorrent
    environment:
      - PUID=888
      - PGID=888
      - TZ=Australia/Perth
      - WEBUI_PORT=8080
    volumes:
      - ./config:/config
      - /srv/downloads:/downloads
    restart: unless-stopped
    network_mode: "container:wg_out"

this is my compose.yml for a qbittorrent instance.

the part you’re interested in is the final line. There’s another container with the wireguard instance called “wg_out”. This network mode attaches this qbittorrent container to that wireguard container’s network stack.

I’d seen gluetun mentioned but didn’t know what it was for until a moment ago.

I’ve heard of tailscale and at least know what that does but never used it.

I personally have a mullvad subscription. I have a container connected to that with wireguard, and then for services I want to use that VPN I just configure them to use the network stack from that container.

I’m not suggesting that my way is the best but it’s worked well for several years now.

Sorry I’m still not really sure what you’re asking for.

I use Open Web UI, which is the worst name ever, but it’s a web ui for interacting with chat format gen AI models.

You can install that locally and point it at any of the models hosted remotely by an inference provider.

So you host the UI but someone else is doing the GPU intensive “inference”.

There seems to be some models for t his task available on huggingface like this one:

https://huggingface.co/fakespot-ai/roberta-base-ai-text-detection-v1

The difficulty may be finding a model which is hosted by an inference provider. Most of the models available on huggingface are just the binary model which you can download and run locally. The popular ones are hosted by inference providers so you can just point a query at their API and get a response.

As an aside, it’s possible or likely that you know more about how Gen AI works than I do, but I think this type of “probability table for the next token” is from the earlier generations. Or, this type of probability inference might be a foundational concept, but there’s a lot more sophistication layered on top now. I genuinely don’t know. I’m super interested in these technologies but there’s a lot to learn.

There are no decent GPT-detection tools.

If there were they would be locally hosted language models, and you’d need a reasonable GPU.

Sorry I don’t really understand what your argument actually is.

Since the dawn of writing, legislators (kings / politicians) have laid down the rules. Regulators (police, tax office) have enforced the rules. And courts decide whether the rules have actually been broken and what the penalties ought to be.

In the vast majority of self assessment situations, it’s very obvious how the law applies to ones situation, there is very little doubt. You just follow the rules and face penalties for breaches.

In those few situations which are unclear, you generally have a range of options:

• review other similar cases heard by courts which might be analogous to your own.
• consult a specialist who can interpret and apply the rules for you.
• ask the god damn regulator where you stand and have them help you self-assess.

Finally, most legislation relating to corporate behavior has safe harbor clauses. That is, where someone has acted reasonably, taken reasonable steps, and made a good-faith attempt to interpret and apply the rules correctly, the regulator won’t penalise them even if they’re found to have breached the rules.

That is to say penalties are usually only applied where there’s a breach, and there’s no scope to argue that it was a reasonable error.

This is a fair and transparent structure with which to ensure the rules are applied fairly to everyone. It’s very robust, tolerant of edge cases, and the most efficient compliance structure we have.

I don’t really know what an alternative would be? If you want a regulator to publish a list of which apps / companies are effected in what way, that’s just nuts. The antithesis of modern democratic economic regulation.

Labor have a vested interest in keeping property prices high as they themselves are all landlords.

This is the dumbest theory that only a child would believe.

Australians have a vested interest in keeping property prices high. Everyone owns property, not just Labor candidates.

No it doesn’t. Our tax system works the same way. It doesn’t lead to overzealous deduction denial because people are worried about getting it wrong.

Its an efficient and transparent approach.

Labor are a party of and for Landlords.

Bullshit.

It was only 8 years ago Labor campaigned on removing capital gains tax discounts which would’ve been a huge kick up the ass for landlords.

They lost that election in spectacular fashion.

This is the right way to make laws and rules.

It’s the same way we do tax - self compliance. You self report but if you’re caught breaking the rules then you face punishments.

If the administration just made a list of who’s effected, it would be perpetually incomplete. This way, everyone is effected.

They can’t just unilaterally decide that your self assessment is “wrong” without explanation. Also their decisions about who is effected are public, and can be relied on by others to self assess.

Are there any restrictions on a FOSS instance? Is there a pay wall?