The establishment democrat cheerleader doesn’t think the ones arguing for new leadership and popular reform are in good faith, got it.
No one cares what you think, about anything, that was part of my point, what you think means nothing until you own up to what you’ve helped do, and explain how you are going to do better from now on.
But why would you? Your leaders don’t. They instruct you how to use emotional arguments and libel to obscure the issue. You never answered the point because you have no answer in reason. Your only arguments are ad hominems, and you just keep lobbing them, knowing enough of the sheep don’t know any better than to believe you, as you drag the united states into a fascist dictatorship.
idk whatever startpage gave me under a search, as I checked after you challenged the definition.
I don’t think you are arguing in good faith or with any credibility.
The establishment democrat cheerleader doesn’t think the ones arguing for new leadership and popular reform are in good faith, got it.
No one cares what you think, about anything, that was part of my point, what you think means nothing until you own up to what you’ve helped do, and explain how you are going to do better from now on.
But why would you? Your leaders don’t. They instruct you how to use emotional arguments and libel to obscure the issue. You never answered the point because you have no answer in reason. Your only arguments are ad hominems, and you just keep lobbing them, knowing enough of the sheep don’t know any better than to believe you, as you drag the united states into a fascist dictatorship.