No, if you need to so far as to have a complicated ToS, then it should be a proper contract complete with signatures on actual paper. Same for any amendments with the option to stay on the original agreement at the time of sale.
I agree that it should be more like a proper contract and that people should understand it. It’s absurd that we have this structure where it’s implied you read even a single word of a TOS.
People should be attacking things like this. Not just boasting on social media about clients that hack YouTube.
No, if you need to so far as to have a complicated ToS, then it should be a proper contract complete with signatures on actual paper. Same for any amendments with the option to stay on the original agreement at the time of sale.
I agree that it should be more like a proper contract and that people should understand it. It’s absurd that we have this structure where it’s implied you read even a single word of a TOS.
People should be attacking things like this. Not just boasting on social media about clients that hack YouTube.
If I had the power to mount a legal challenge against a megacorp, I would. Unfortunately all I have the power to do is share workarounds.