Some years ago, I hosted my own matrix server for a few months. I’m an experienced self-hoster, but I remeber that Matrix was paticularly hard to host, requiring weird proxy rules, DNS adjustments, federation never worked reliably and push notifications never worked at all. I ditched the project soon because I also had no real use for it. However, I recently had some ideas where a Matrix server would be useful again. Has anyone attempted to install it recently and can tell me whether the situation has improved? Also, which server do you recommend? There still is synapse but I found it paticularly complicated to host. Dendrite is now archived and the current fork seems to be tuwunel which doesn’t seem to be under very active development.

      • hard_zero1@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        I’ve last seen it last month. And I have an old chat, where FluffyChat and (“old”) Element show all messages by now, but Element X can’t decrypt many and both Elements report that they can’t guarantee the authenticity of many messages (even my own). For a long time, my chat partner could only read messages I sent via FluffyChat but not those sent by Element. I have not checked if that is still the case.

        • Jade@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          “can’t guarantee the authenticity of this message” just means it was restored from backup. In the same vein, if you can decrypt a message in any client, it should upload the keys to the message backup so it can be decrypted on other clients, even ones that haven’t logged in.

        • oranki@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          Some months ago, I had UTD issues with Element X too. My hs has been up for some years, and the devs claimed they had done a lot to fix UTDs.

          I was about to bring the server down, but as a last resort decided to log out all but one Element web session which was able to decrypt the messages and try resetting the key backup. Haven’t had any UTD issues since then.

          Maybe worth a try.

    • Suzune@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      This is quite annoying. When will devs learn to tell people to resolve the problem instead of just showing a pointless error messages?

      • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 days ago

        afaik those errors can’t really be solved by users. I mean other than using an up to date client and server.

        • Suzune@ani.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          If users cannot do anything because all encryption keys are lost, then they need to know that and also how to avoid the situation in the future.

          I think it’s not a bug. It’s simply no one online who can share a decryption key.

          • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            its often a bug, because the clients who have the keys don’t know they should retry sending.

            but also it’s all been fixed a year ago as I know. I don’t usually use dm rooms and public ones are not encrypted, so I wouldn’t know if I didn’t read about it.

          • Jade@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            Matrix encryption keys don’t need other people online - they get queued up as messages for each device you have.

    • Jade@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      I’ve only seen this message in the last months where different servers are having network issues and can’t talk

  • stratself@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago
    • DNS adjustments aren’t needed if you do .well-known delegations which is easier
    • Can recommend continuwuity, it runs much better on less resources. Lacks certain features compared to Synapse but overall good
    • Notifications (and read markers) depend on client-specific black magic to work
    • Federation do sometimes silent-fail completely, you can reset continuwuity’s cache + restart when that happens. But full room history convergence needs patience
    • Don’t join large rooms unless your server can handle the load
    • Don’t host public rooms without modbots

    The many small bugs make Matrix still bad - I wouldn’t recommend a non-tech user unless accompanied by a 24/7 admin. It is trying to improve but very slow because of reasons

  • Lena@gregtech.eu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 days ago

    Matrix works perfectly for me, if you’re setting up a new server, I’d go with tuwunel. I’m stuck on synapse, when the tuwunel team makes a way to migrate, I’ll do it.

  • vga@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Matrix seems to work well. I’m on a smallish non-profit server. I regard it as the premium open-source step forward from IRC.

    The worst problem is that there are really no channels that I care to follow.

  • Shimitar@downonthestreet.eu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 days ago

    I host my tuwunnel server and I am happy with it. The lack of a top level client is my turn down. Element X is good but still lacking, and fluffy chat is maybe better looking but more lacking.

    My matrix use case is only WhatsApp and telegram backup using the bridges, actually… So YMMV.

    • TypFaffke@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      My experience as well, though you might take a look at the recent fluffy chat 2.0 release. It is the closest to a usable client.

      But I agree and it’s baffling to me how a project backed by so many organisations and a considerable amount of cash fails to deliver even a decent user experience.

  • downhomechunk@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 days ago

    I’ve been wanting to get matrix up for my family and friends to chat with my 6 year old on her tablet. I found nextcloud talk to do all the things I wanted with none of the hassle. My daughter is a ridiculous texter.

  • Samsy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    I use conduit. And really happy with it. Since I use 3 bridges the compose.yml is a mess. It works really nice. The sliding feature boosts all media files. But there is always something broken or misconfigured. Actually my WhatsApp bridge blocks all mediafiles and I was too busy to fix it already.

  • ohshit604@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    As the end use my biggest gripe with Matrix is with voice communications, it’s almost as if you sneeze wrong you’ll lose connection to the voice group, screen sharing is horrible, no audio and the window is not adjustable, cant even make it full screen.

    Now they’re reducing people’s usage by putting in a subscription and locking certain features, at least on the home server.

    While I am disappointed they did at least take my advice and prevent Windows Recall from capturing people’s messages.

  • underline960@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Damn. That sucks. (Edit: Referring to the comments saying Matrix is dead and dying.) I get that IRC and XMPP are more stable and built around federation from the ground up, but… they’re not Discord replacements.

    That was IMHO, the point of Matrix/Element.

    Tell me if I’m wrong, but a significant part of a network’s resilience is the number of nodes and users.

    Without a glowup or some kind of repackaging, IRC/XMPP are doomed to stay niche.

    • Atherel@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      Well Discord started as a replacement for IRC and TeamSpeak/Mumble, then began to add more and more things and got used as a forum replacement and everything went down the hill. Why not going back to the roots? We had fucking IRC scripts for matchmaking in Q3CTF.

      • underline960@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 days ago

        I wouldn’t mind going back to IRC roots if it could be made more user friendly and integrate voice and video chat.

        Good UX/UI goes a long way to make it so non-technical people can join and strengthen the network.

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        Discord has quite a few good features that IRC doesn’t. I will agree that it being used as a replacement for a forum, while also being unsearchable, is amazingly stupid. However, it’s used by almost everyone for a reason, and to ignore that (if you were to develop and alternative) ensures you won’t succeed. Yeah, we don’t need every feature from Discord, but easy voice/text/video chats, image/file sharing, and all the other useful things are required. Yeah, we can probably lose the emotes and crap and be fine.

    • curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      7 days ago

      Xmpp supports group chat, 1:1 messaging, you’ve got webtrc support for voice/video, and its extensible.

      Jingle even has screen sharing (and I think a WIP remote control function).

      What is missing from xmpp?

      • underline960@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        7 days ago

        Technically, nothing.

        In practice, who do you know that’s using it and doesn’t run Arch, by the way?


        My point isn’t that IRC/XMPP aren’t technically capable.

        It’s that they’re not designed for non-technical users.

        I want corporate social media to die. Mastodon and Piefed are far from killing the beast, but they’ve made the more progress than most projects have seen in a long time.

        I want corporate messaging to die. Matrix is far from killing the beast, but for a little while, at least it was trying.

        • curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 days ago

          In practice, who do you know that’s using it and doesn’t run Arch, by the way?

          Well I mostly run Debian, but I do have arch on a machine so maybe I don’t count.

          It’s that they’re not designed for non-technical users.

          Have to agree there, it takes some effort if you’re setting it up for friends and family.

          • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            I think judging something really depends on the requirements. No one said using technology was going to be simple and easy. We should make it as easy as we can do, but no more than that. There’s still a lot of room for improvement. But in the end the commercial services are geared towards convenience. And they’ll always outpace us. We have to set up servers and jump through a few hoops so it’s us in control of the network. There is no other feasible way to do it.

            Though I really wish we had some messenger that makes encryption foolproof. And rock solid, and with a resource footprint of IRC when concerned with text messages, but not limited to that.

        • poVoq@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          Quicksy and Prav apps allow you to easily signup via SMS verification like WhatApp etc. Super easy and the app works like Whatsapp, completely usable for non technical users (much more so than any Matrix client).

          And Snikket is an super easy all in one solution for running a XMPP based small group server with invite based onboarding. Also completely non-technical user compatible.

    • pedz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      I had the same experience as OP when I tried Matrix a few years ago. No hate on it but it was not easy and I gave up because I already had a simple IRC setup that’s working for me and my friends.

      Some IRC clients are now web based and it’s been enough to keep a few of my friends there instead of Discord. We use The Lounge. It can keep a history, display images, videos, play mp3s, and show previews of most URLs. Like, we can simply copy/paste images into a channel and they are uploaded on the server and displayed in the chat. There’s also push notifications and it’s mobile friendly.

      Convos also does something like this. Apparently it can also do video chat but I’ve never got it to work.

      I’ve recently been thinking about giving Matrix another try but I’m pretty sure my friends are going to stay on “modern” IRC anyway.

  • cactus@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    damn, was not expecting to see so much hate towards matrix.
    it sure was annoying to set up, but once I got it up the way I wanted, it kind of just worked from that moment on. I’ve had it for some 5 months now and it works as intended with no issues, aside from some small glitches here and there which get fixed very fast (on the mobile app).
    my use case was getting off Discord with a bunch of friends, so we needed a reliable way to have multiple chats, channels/rooms and good voice chat with screen sharing. element call does those well. my federation is of course also closed. for me e2ee is just a bonus
    I think that if that’s your use case, it’s good for that. synapse does seem a bit inefficient but I guess you can’t do much about it

    • superglue@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      My experience is the same as yours, but I think the people complaining are the ones who are federated and are in large communities. Matrix apparently doesnt handle large rooms very well.

      • cactus@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        fair enough, that’s true. it was one of the reasons I turned off federation, even on a beefy server synapse still lagged and timed out when I would join medium sized rooms.